{"id":10933,"date":"2016-01-23T17:33:22","date_gmt":"2016-01-23T17:33:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kdigital.id\/maulana\/?post_type=insight&#038;p=933"},"modified":"2026-07-01T17:44:06","modified_gmt":"2026-07-01T09:44:06","slug":"registration-of-trademark-holiday-resort-lombok-was-in-good-faith-and-not-having-similiraties-with-other-trademark","status":"publish","type":"insight","link":"https:\/\/kdigital.id\/maulana\/news\/registration-of-trademark-holiday-resort-lombok-was-in-good-faith-and-not-having-similiraties-with-other-trademark\/","title":{"rendered":"REGISTRATION OF TRADEMARK \u201cHOLIDAY RESORT LOMBOK\u201d WAS IN GOOD FAITH AND NOT HAVING SIMILIRATIES WITH OTHER TRADEMARK"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 18px;\">SIS CONTINENTS HOTEL, INC (Plaintiff) filed the cancellation lawsuit against \u201cHOLIDAY RESORT LOMBOK\u201d trademark that owned and legally registered by PT. LOMBOK SEASIDE COTTAGE (Defendant) at the Commercial Court of Central Jakarta District Court register number 41\/Merek\/2010\/PN. Niaga.Jkt.Pst.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 18px;\">The substante of the lawsuit was the Plaintiff as the owner of \u201cHOLIDAY INN\u201d and \u201cHOLIDAY INN RESORT\u201d trademark objected to the use of \u201cHOLIDAY\u201d trademark including \u201cHOLIDAY RESORT LOMBOK\u201d trademark owned by Defendant.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 18px;\">The panel of judge consisting of Mr. Pramodana K. Kusumah Atmadja, Mr. Marsudin Nainggolan, and Mr. Ennid Hasanuddin who examined this case gave legal considerations that there was no similarities between Plaintiff\u2019s Trademark and Defendant\u2019s Trademark and the word \u201cHOLIDAY\u201d was not it\u2019s essential part. Moreover, the registration of \u201cHOLIDAY RESORT LOMBOK\u201d trademark by Defendant was in good faith so that it must be protected by law. This verdict issued on September 6, 2010.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 18px;\">The Plaintiff objected the verdict and filed appeal to the Supreme Court. In the Supreme Court\u2019s issued the judgement number 985 K\/Pdt.Sus\/2010 on February 9, 2012 with the panel of judge consisting of Ms. Mieke Komar, Mr. H. Achmad Yamanie and Mr. Soltoni Mohdally. In it\u2019s legal considerations, the Supreme Court declared the legal considerations of the Commercial Court (Judex Facti) had been in accordance with the law.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","insight_section":[8],"class_list":["post-10933","insight","type-insight","status-publish","hentry","insight_section-publications-insights"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kdigital.id\/maulana\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/insight\/10933","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kdigital.id\/maulana\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/insight"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kdigital.id\/maulana\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/insight"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kdigital.id\/maulana\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10933"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"insight_section","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kdigital.id\/maulana\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/insight_section?post=10933"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}